Filed under “This person got elected?” comes the UPI story about delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton from D.C. Norton thinks that people will misunderstand the recent change in the Department of the Interior policy that allows citizens to carry a concealed firearm if it is allowed under the local jurisdiction’s laws. Norton is afraid that normally law abiding citizens will carry a concealed firearm to the inauguration. D.C. does not allow citizens to carry a concealed firearm, so under the current policy, no citizen is allowed to carry a concealed firearm at the inauguration.
Since someone who would do harm to the president is a criminal, and criminals by definition do not obey the laws, it would seem that Norton is only worried about stupid, but law abiding, citizens. That’s kind of funny because I am worried about stupid politicians.
Other articles that will amaze you:
- The NFL’s Anti-Gun Stance: You Better Not Want to Defend Yourself If You Are a Player
- Texas School District Approves CCW: Harrold, TX Authorizes Teachers to Carry Firearms to Protect Students
- AZ Governor Vetoed Pro-Gun Reform Bill: Gov. Napolitano Denies Your Ability to Carry a Firearm in Your Privately Owned Car Again!
- Ohio Expands Right to Self-Defense: Castle Doctrine Now Law
- Soccer Mom and Open Carry of a Firearm
I am a democrat and I carry a gun and I am not afraid for you to have a gun.
Not all of the democrats are for gun controle .
Thanks for stopping by and posting.
You are right: not all Democrats are anti-gun. However, the Democrats leading your party are. I hope that you are working to change your political party’s view of civil rights and one day all Americans can support the right to keep and bear arms.
I “second” that (pun intended)!
I dont care if a person is a D or R as long as they support our right to carry! I travel all around the south east and have had to study each states rules on carry, we need a national carry permit. Damb these anti-gunners