Americans Support Right-to-Carry
ByAccording to a recent Zogby poll, 83% of Americans support Right to Carry laws. I am guessing that you didn’t see that reported in your local paper or on the national news. I did not, but maybe I just missed it.
When asked “Currently, 39 states have laws that allow residents to carry firearms to protect themselves, only if they pass a background check and pay a fee to cover administrative costs. Most of those states also require applicants to have firearms safety training. Do you support or oppose this law?”, 83% responded they support these laws, while only 11% indicated they opposed them.
Of course, that kind of common sense thinking has no place in the media. Instead, the media preferred to report on the defeat of the Thune-Vitter amendment, an amendment that received a majority vote in favor of it, but failed to pass the “super majority” required by Senate Democrats.
From the NRA-ILA:
The United States Senate recently voted on an amendment that would have allowed Right-to-Carry permit holders to carry in all other states that also grant carry permits. The amendment, sponsored by Sens. John Thune (R-S.D.) and David Vitter (R-La.), won a significant majority of votes, 58 to 39, but failed to reach the 60 votes needed to avoid a Senate filibuster.
Anti-gun senators have long argued that the majority of Americans do not support firearm freedoms. They made this erroneous claim once again during the debate on the Thune/Vitter amendment. Now, a new poll has proven them wrong.
Conducted by Zogby International and The O’Leary Report, the poll looked at Americans’ opinions on some key issues related to the Second Amendment. One of the questions asked: “Currently, 39 states have laws that allow residents to carry firearms to protect themselves, only if they pass a background check and pay a fee to cover administrative costs. Most of those states also require applicants to have firearms safety training. Do you support or oppose this law?”
It will come as a shock to the 39 senators who voted to deny law-abiding Americans their right to self-defense when traveling outside their home states, but the results showed that 83% of Americans support Right-to-Carry laws. The poll also revealed that support for Right-to-Carry crosses party lines, with 86% of independent voters and 80% of Democratic voters supporting Right-to-Carry. This is no surprise to gun owners, however, who have long known that the majority of Americans support the Second Amendment and the right to self-defense.
The anti-gun community is trumpeting its 39-vote procedural “victory” as a major achievement. But just like the vote in the Senate, the overwhelming majority of Americans are on our side.



2 Comments
August 17th, 2009 at 10:22 am
I do not oppose “right to carry” laws; however, I do oppose the CCW option. What happens when government decides to change the rules “x” amount of years from now? It isn’t like they haven’t done that before. Too many firearms owners forget that there has been confiscation in America. What is to stop government from increasing the requirements and cost of the permit, pushing many people out of the system? Do we really want the influential and wealth to be the only ones with an ability to defend their family and themselves? I wish the NRA would get off their CCW promotion campaign and stop shoving them down people’s throats. They are playing a dangerous game and they actually hurt RKBA enthusiast in states like Arizona. Example: Az’s Restaurant Carry law ended up for CCW permit holders only because the “Parking Lot” bill was a higher priority. Just my 2 cents.
October 11th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
It seems you may have missed a point that if you carry a concealed weapon and get caught you will lose the weapon, put on watch list and have a weapons charge which could lead to a felony. I am ex police officer and retired fed officer and I would like to see everyone carry, it saved my butt more than once. If we don’t have a watchdog group ( NRA and others) you could see the 2 Amendment go away and we do not want that