<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guns Holsters and GearGuns Holsters and Gear &#187; Gun Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/category/military_firearms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com</link>
	<description>Guns Holsters and Gear provides comprehensive news &#38; reviews on firearms, gun gear and holsters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of the Bulge</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/22/battle-of-the-bulge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/22/battle-of-the-bulge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle of the Bulge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=11448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Battle of the Bulge was well under way 67 years ago today.  By this time, Bastogne was surrounded and the Allies were scrambling to bring troops and resources to bear.  Ultimately, the Allies would decisively crush the final German offensive of the war, but the cost was very high.  Tens of thousands of troops [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/22/battle-of-the-bulge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forgotten Weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/20/forgotten-weapons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/20/forgotten-weapons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military firearms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=11380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently introduced to an awesome blog called Forgotten Weapons.  The site covers old and historical firearms, especially those where there is a lack of good information.  They have an amazing array of photos and have dozens of original manuals scanned for download. If you have any interest in historical firearms, you definitely need [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/20/forgotten-weapons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EOD Prodder</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/19/eod-prodder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/19/eod-prodder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=11361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything called an EOD Prodder just sounds like a bad idea. Of course, growing up in the south, we had &#8220;poking sticks&#8221; for prodding mounds of ants, snakes, electric fences and virtually anything else that could hurt us.  So, I guess at some level I really do understand the thing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/19/eod-prodder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>General Casey Elected to Colt Defense Board</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/18/general-casey-elected-to-colt-defense-board/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/18/general-casey-elected-to-colt-defense-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbine trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General George W. Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Army]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=11307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move that will surely enhance Colt&#8217;s bids on US Government contracts, US Army General George W. Casey (ret.) was appointed to the governing board of Colt Defense on December 1, 2011.  Gen. Casey&#8217;s most recent posting was as Chief of Staff of the Army from February 2007 until his retirement in April 2011. Casey&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/12/18/general-casey-elected-to-colt-defense-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPS-43 + Surplus Ammo = Ka-Boom!</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/11/18/pps-43-surplus-ammo-ka-boom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/11/18/pps-43-surplus-ammo-ka-boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.62x25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaboom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPS-43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vurrwapen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=11036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheap Czech ammo from the 50&#8242;s isn&#8217;t necessarily inexpensive &#8211; especially if it destroys your gun or blows off your hand.  Fortunately, no one was seriously wounded in filming of this incident&#8230; I understand the desire to shoot cheap surplus ammo.  I really do.  But maybe 60-year-old commie ammo isn&#8217;t the way to go.  I&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/11/18/pps-43-surplus-ammo-ka-boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delta Force and the Glock</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/09/12/delta-force-and-the-glock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/09/12/delta-force-and-the-glock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pistols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=8922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following e-mail was forwarded to me by Gunner, a fellow blogger over at Gunner&#8217;s Journal.  Gunner is a 1911 expert and has contacts with various people who spent some time in the Special Forces community, including Delta Force. A lot of what Delta does is understandably secret, and there have been much debate about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2011/09/12/delta-force-and-the-glock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midwest Industries Tri-Rail Mount for M2/M3 .50 Caliber</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/06/25/midwest-industries-tri-rail-mount-for-m2m3-50-caliber/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/06/25/midwest-industries-tri-rail-mount-for-m2m3-50-caliber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics and Sighting Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.50 Caliber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midwest Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=4430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Midwest Industries is now selling a tri-rail mount for the M2/M3 heavy machine guns.  The rail allows the mounting of lasers and optics on the M2 without interfering with the use of the iron sights or field stripping. The tri-rail is 100% made in the USA, and retails for $399.95. Allows field stripping without rail [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/06/25/midwest-industries-tri-rail-mount-for-m2m3-50-caliber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another &#8220;5.56 NATO Bad&#8221; Article?</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/05/23/another-556-nato-bad-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/05/23/another-556-nato-bad-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 14:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.56 NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=4128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate over the effectiveness of the 5.56 NATO cartridge has raged for decades, and the current war in Afghanistan hasn&#8217;t changed things.  Critics of the 5.56 generally bemoan the lack of &#8220;stopping power&#8221; and poor long range performance as compared to other rounds like the 7.62&#215;51 (aka .308 Win). In a Marine Corps Times [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/05/23/another-556-nato-bad-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine Corps SR21 Sniper Rifle</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/04/27/marine-corps-sr21-sniper-rifle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/04/27/marine-corps-sr21-sniper-rifle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR21]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=3923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Marine Corps search for a new sniper rifle continues, with current options being weighed in light of the current SOCom rifle competition.  The new rifle is designated the SR21, or &#8220;Sniper Rifle &#8211; 21st Century,&#8221; and will allow Marines to engage targets to 1500 meters and beyond. The Marine Corps has not detailed the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/04/27/marine-corps-sr21-sniper-rifle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marines May Field H&amp;K IAR in Fall</title>
		<link>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/04/19/marines-may-field-hk-iar-in-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/04/19/marines-may-field-hk-iar-in-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.56]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M249]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Marines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/?p=3851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Marine Corps Times is reporting the US Marines may field about 4100 H&#38;K Infantry Automatic Rifles (IAR) in the fall of 2010.  The H&#38;K IAR is in testing now after being selected from a group of other rifles to replace the M249 SAW in certain units. The H&#38;K IAR is a variant of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/2010/04/19/marines-may-field-hk-iar-in-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

